Pnas Pending Recommendation After Editor Review

Title should be clear, concise and limited to no more than 10 words. That is how the press and some lawmakers have portrayed a recent federal study and hastily done addendum by Department of the Interior (DOI) biologists that came out on the eve of a Senate vote on drilling. 11, EP 6, and then vetted it with stakeholders. ” March 2018 – The Panel agreed to table the re-review of the parabens. Commentary by Marcia Angell (former editor of NEJM) and Richard Horton (former editor of Lancet) essentially said that the bulk of published reports of clinical studies is, if not valueless, at a minimum, seriously flawed. If you click 'Accept', this automatically opens a web browser page confirming that you've chosen to review the paper and you'll be prompted to click 'Pending Assignments', where you can view the manuscript. Using these sequences to get a start, it was possible to completely sequence the full virus genome, and the virus was labeled, HoCV-1. George Daston, a. Stephan’s Hospital in Budapest. Now it is in the "Awaiting Editors Decision" mode for the past one week. and Weissleder, R. Disputes about authorship may delay or prevent review and/or publication of the manuscript. I outline my findings and arguments in greater detail below, but the short version is: (a) Every president since Reagan has wielded the Recommendations Clause as a source of negative executive power to escape triggering laws, but the Trump administration does so much more frequently than the Obama administration did and is on pace to rival the. In these cases, the handling editor acts as a referee, considering the review comments, re-reading the manuscript, and making the decision as to how the manuscript will be processed. The editor conducts the review of the paper as described for Track I. For further details, refer to the Review of Operations set out on pages 3 to 20. " Class-leading, audiophile. After viewing the abstract/submission, click either 'Agree to Review' or 'Decline to Review'. Pnas Pending Recommendation After Under Review. Submission updated to 'pending recommendation' a few days ago. Submit my own review: allows you to fill out the reviewer questions, select a recommendation term, enter comments to author, and upload files. is accepted, will be published in PNAS as editor of the article. CFR INDEXES AND TABULAR GUIDES. After completing his military service, he became active in the civil rights movement, participating in the Montgomery bus boycott and sit-ins to protest segregation. On the email inviting them to review there are 3 links, one to say they agree to review the manuscript, one that declines the invitation to review and one that specifies that the reviewer is unavailable to review this paper. ” March 2018 – The Panel agreed to table the re-review of the parabens. This section was formally approved by the CSE Board of Directors on March 30, 2012. A national laboratory in Chantilly, Va. Turnitin solutions promote academic integrity, streamline grading and feedback, deter plagiarism, and improve student outcomes. Rebel Without a Clue: Autonomy and Authority in the American Public School Resource Type: Article First Published: 2018 Published: 2018. Science - December 2nd 2011 (True PDF) - Free download as PDF File (. @David_S_Bristol well the 'Pending Final Recommendation' was unfortunately. But after reading a book of poems Matt wrote for his estranged mistress, Willa decides she will settle for nothing less than the feelings that inspired him to write such tender words. The first one to a total of 6 months but ultimately ended in an Accept (and my first scientific publication, yay!), now this second one has gone to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" in 4 days. How to write a reviewer report 2 - Accept for publication without revision - Ask for minor revision for likely acceptance - Request major revision for another review process - Reject outright Responsibility of the reviewer The reviewer must provide to the editor an objective, expert opinion on whether the paper satisfies the. In these cases, the handling editor acts as a referee, considering the review comments, re-reading the manuscript, and making the decision as to how the manuscript will be processed. the re-review of the parabens pending the input of such an expert. the directory of PNAS member editors and their research inter-ests. 0840 I am a registered nurse who helps nursing students pass their NCLEX. Code reviews at Microsoft are an integral part of the development process. 3 Independent Peer ReviewersRecognized subject experts are selected by the Member Editor to review the work. The checklist was designed as an optional instrument to help adoption of this reporting framework. TWO CATEGORIES «Published papers can be made immediately available online at no cost to the reader when the authors choose the open access option. Submit my own review: allows you to fill out the reviewer questions, select a recommendation term, enter comments to author, and upload files. A comprehensive review of positive psychology. 3) Review by Associate Editor, assigned to Subject Editor: After I assign the article to the Associate Editor, they take another look at it to make sure it is really suitable for Biotropica, often in consultation with one the members of our Editorial Board. Note that the PNAS License to Publish conveyed at initial. These legume options included intercropping two legume crops (e. We now understand that the injured spinal cord is in a precarious state, experiencing a complex cascade of inflammatory events and hemodynamic compromise. The Pending Home Sales Index, which is based on contract signings, increased 6. Angelides, Ph. She recalls that the first paper she ever submitted was a very long manuscript attempting to analyze 20 years' worth of data on changes in coral ecosystems in Kenya. Grammarly allows me to get those communications out and. Although other journals have given rise to incrementally more specialized research and review journals, we have kept the mission of PNAS to serve science as the official journal of the National. News stories: Excerpts from highly revealing major media news stories suggest major cover-ups of health, energy, media, 9/11, war, elections, and more. mutations predict SHH-driven castration resistance. I submitted my second paper through ScholarOne this Wednesday. students for my new laboratory in the Department of Biology. It is meant to be flexible to adapt to various journal policies, and provides two levels of reporting stringency, a minimum recommendation and a best practice recommendation. 33 times lower than the recommendation of the editor and. The name of the editor remains anonymous to the author until the paper is accepted. Peer Review at Science Publications. Before I start… If you're tired of scams and want a real solution for making money online check out my recommendation below. Hans responded highly positive after seeing the manuscript and suggested we submit the paper through the direct route to PNAS. After much time reading and comparing specs and features, I have decided to go for Affinity Photo by Serif, and for the video editor it was between Corel's Video Studio Ultimate 10, and Power Director 16 Ultimate. PNAS adopted a policy in 2005 that does not aim to eliminate conflict but to manage it. com Menu and widgets editor of Clinical Proof Pc cells treated with vorinostat and VPA soon after an incubation of and h. The Pending Home Sales Index, which is based on contract signings, increased 6. " Class-leading, audiophile. The "Manuscripts with Decisions" view lists all submissions that have received a decision. The final report will be presented to the. Healy never acted on her committee's recommendation that Dr. Under Editor Review 2016-07-12 Under Editorial Board Review 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Completed 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Started 2016-06-24 Author Approved Submission 2016-06-24 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted. Deccan Herald brings breaking news, today's Live News on Sports, Business, Fitness, Entertainment, Opinions from leading. Also check out the latest edition of Hanai‘Ai, with its new editor Sarah Moore, to access the formal presentations (to receive it, email [email protected] After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. 009 Letter of recommendation. It is our policy that a single negative review should mandate rejection provided that the editor agrees with the negative review. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the action editor and reviewer(s)' comments and revise your. If, after contacting the agency, you find the material is not available, please notify the Director of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC 20408, or call (202) 741-6010. So when you resubmit with these minor revisions, the associate editor checks to make sure you've made the changes, and then accepts it without further review. When a reviewer clicks on one of these links, the system. The property in question is located at the. 我们这篇文章于2010年6月底投到PNAS,投稿后很快通过了editor board review和editor review, 进入under review后等待了20天,意见回来后结果是拒稿,但是我们看了两个reviewer 的意见后感觉很不服:. Generally, features that are planned to be removed in a future release are set to deprecated first, with an alternative provided. Measles is characterized by a prodrome of fever (as high as 105°F) and malaise, cough, coryza, and conjunctivitis, followed by a maculopapular rash. The link will be available for 30 days after the last day of the course. Dividends Paid or Recommended. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. With the latest Bing Ads Editor tips, this training will help you understand how to:. (PDF - 665 KB) A Word from OLAW and. Next, the NAS member editor can reject the paper or send the paper for review. An army of clean-up workers were drafted in after a dyke failure unleashed a billion gallons of ash from a Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) power plant 36 miles south-west of Knoxville. )CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications 1. Original Research & Contributions. This issue provides a clinical overview of Lyme disease, focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and practice improvement. PNAS今早终于接受。分享一些经验供大家参考。我做的是病毒方向,一个动物病毒不感染人。发综合期刊还是有挑战。写的方面主要是多突出generalinterest,突出只是用病毒做一个modelorganism来了解generalmolecularmechanism. Applied and Environmental Microbiology (AEM) publishes descriptions of all aspects of applied microbial research, basic research on microbial ecology, and research of a genetic and molecular nature that focuses on microbial topics of practical value. The editor may obtain reviews of the paper from at least 2 qualified reviewers, each from a different institution and not from the authors' institutions. Section Editor incorporates Faculty Advisor comments into the completed review summary and finalizes the letter to the author. The expert who served as editor concluded that although this work is interesting, it does not have the broad appeal needed for PNAS and is better suited for a more specialized journal. Reviewers are asked to complete the review of the manuscript within 2 weeks and to return a short review form. Here's what it really means when a sale is pending. The Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis) is the largest living species of lizard, averaging 7-10 feet in length and weighing around 150 pounds. Original Research & Contributions. I got copy-pasted ‘Sorry for the delay’ emails or was just ignored. The reviewers recommendations are evaluated. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. The FTC has revealed that they have. 干细胞之家 - 中国干细胞行业门户第一站 › 干细胞之家论坛 › 干细胞实验室技术交流 › 实验室综合讨论区 › PNAS二稿的Pending Final Recommendation状态要等多久啊. 11, EP 6, and then vetted it with stakeholders. recommendation ban dredging in any areas used by swimmers. Lab Animal 2019; 48(10). After review, the member editor makes a recommendation about acceptance to the Editorial Board member. Rebel Without a Clue: Autonomy and Authority in the American Public School Resource Type: Article First Published: 2018 Published: 2018. If, after contacting the agency, you find the material is not available, please notify the Director of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC 20408, or call (202) 741-6010. Reviews for "Nature Communications" I am very disappointed with the overworked Editors and the lousy Editorial standards at this moneymaking journal. As a peer reviewer for Science magazine, you are part of a valued community. Stucke,Should Competition Policy Promote Happiness?, 81 FordhamL. United States Patent 9587003. the comparator tool GLCC campaigners have been using the E-Atlas to support engagement with national policy-makers and influencers. As of 15 March 2015, I'm taking a 3 year stint on the editorial board of PNAS. Two months after that, a descion was made that to have a major revision. The change in status from 'Under review' to 'Pending recommendation' means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. Health media articles: Concise excerpts from highly revealing media articles on health suggest major cover-up. RDoC is a research. L-DOS47 is administered once weekly over 14 days followed by 7 days rest in each treatment cycle. After extensive discussion at its meeting in early August and on the recommendation of its Committee on Publications, the NAS Council voted to approve the proposal to eliminate Communicated papers from PNAS, effective July 1, 2010, and strengthen the system of Prearranged Editors. CFR INDEXES AND TABULAR GUIDES. Motivation: The editor should have sent out the paper for review as a similar paper had been published in PNAS last year and we had much better results than the method. WASHINGTON, DC—The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) announces the appointment of Inder M. Also check out the latest edition of Hanai‘Ai, with its new editor Sarah Moore, to access the formal presentations (to receive it, email [email protected] Patients are recruited into cohorts and received the same dose of L-DOS47 on Days 1 and 8 of each treatment cycle. is accepted, will be published in PNAS as editor of the article. Turnitin solutions promote academic integrity, streamline grading and feedback, deter plagiarism, and improve student outcomes. PNAS research papers by submission track (top) and citation performance compared to Direct submission (bottom). Thanks for submitting your work to JMIR and we apologize if the process takes longer than anticipated. Play daily or season long fantasy football, baseball, basketball and more. The change in status from 'Under review' to 'Pending recommendation' means that peer review of your paper is done and the Associate Editor (AE) will now go through the reviews and give his/her recommendation on whether it should be accepted, rejected, or revised. This is actually the very first communication I ever got. ' I am assuming that the editor wants another opinion before making a decision?. You are also listed as a Guest Associate Editor on the Frontiers editorial board for the duration of the Topic. Exterior and interior evidence of feeding on bolls was recorded 2 weeks after exposure to insects. Pnas Pending Recommendation After Under Review. we can look no further at the legal trading of the Scrapie TSE. These emitted pollutants have been associated with numerous adverse public health and environmental impacts (Table 1). Of course, this terminates your PNAS License to Publish and you are free to publish elsewhere. Brain tissue was placed in 10% buffered formalin and after a minimum of 4 days of fixation appropriate sections of brainstem in the obex region were put in cassettes and kept in fresh formalin until they were processed for routine paraffin embedding. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was "moderate. Chaired by Aliaksandr Birukou, the Executive Editor for Computer Science at Springer Nature, the group has met regularly over the past two years, collaborating to create use cases and define metadata to identify and describe conference series and events. All 2,800 NAS members are eligible to serve as member editors; 1,236 member editors handled papers. After review, the member editor makes a recommendation about acceptance to the Editorial Board member. In most cases this is a single-blind assessment with at least two independent reviewers, followed by a final acceptance/rejection decision by the Editor-in-Chief, or another academic editor approved by the Editor-in-Chief. After a few years of…. Authors must suggest a minimum of three appropriate reviewers. How to use pending in a sentence. It is now. The Section Editor sends these documents to the Editor-in-Chief with the recommendation to conditionally accept pending revisions, accept with no revisions, revise and resubmit, or reject without the option to revise. All will fondly remember this era, for we’re not just living through peak oil, but peak food, travel, porn, beer, books, canned music and population, etc. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) launched the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) in 2009 in response to the 2008 NIMH Strategic Plan’s call for new ways of classifying mental illnesses that are based on dimensions of observable behavioral and neurobiological measures. Quick Digression: How to get published in Science or Nature Work very, very hard on your cover letter; ~90% of papers get rejected without review Need to convince the non-specialist editors why the paper is incredibly important and possibly interesting to general public After you do that, your chances are rumored to be ~50% (twice as good as Am. However, after that date the link will expire and you will no longer be able to claim your credits online. After the top rated review, the remarks purchasers make about their 39 POUNDS of Cheez Whiz are pretty great. Seventy-two hours after treatment the contents of each well were harvested in their entirety and stained with propidium iodide (Sigma Life Sciences, St. PNAS manages the review process. It is important to remember what a time it was. Indeed, much science has changed about the Scrapie TSE prion, including more science linking Scrapie to humans. Used by over 7,000,000 students, IXL provides personalized learning in more than 8,000 topics, covering math, language arts, science, social studies, and Spanish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. Stucke,Should Competition Policy Promote Happiness?, 81 FordhamL. The content of In the Clinic is drawn from the clinical information and education resources of the American College of Physicians (ACP), including MKSAP (Medical Knowledge. He also serves as an editor for the MIT Sloan Management Review initiative on Artificial Intelligence in Business. Unite news release. The only variable that changed significantly was blood urea nitrogen, which increased significantly after 2 y (P = 0. I then rebased the Debian package onto that. This research, using a mouse model, shows that following inoculation of mouse-adapted bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) directly into the gut, infectivity subsequently becomes widespread in tissues of the oral cavity, including dental pulp, salivary glands and gingiva, during the preclinical as well as clinical stage of disease. Scale fast — without fear. 33 times lower than the recommendation of the editor and. The next week, they say it won't. edu or [email protected] NIH Grant Applications. Under Editor Review 2016-07-12 Under Editorial Board Review 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Completed 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Started 2016-06-24 Author Approved Submission 2016-06-24 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted. It updates when it has been assigned to a specific editor. 048) but not after 1 y (P = 0. the re-review of the parabens pending the input of such an expert. Previous research had indicated that farmers preferred the “doubling up” of edible legumes because they improved soil fertility, provided food for consumption and. Rather, the notorious market list—and the Special 301 Process more broadly—is an aspirational project of. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was "moderate. Recommended Citation Maurice E. (with Maurice Brookhart) from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and his PhD (with Bruce Ganem) from Cornell. com Menu and widgets editor of Clinical Proof Pc cells treated with vorinostat and VPA soon after an incubation of and h. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the action editor and reviewer(s)' comments and revise your. How to use pending in a sentence. Dose levels of L-DOS47 are escalated in further cohorts following a review of safety data by the Trial Steering Committee. Steve goes on to blame the (then) 574 referees of TAR for the virtual lack of commentaries in TAR, particularly commentaries on recently published papers in TAR. 009 Letter of recommendation. PNAS adopted a policy in 2005 that does not aim to eliminate conflict but to manage it. Register for an ORCID iD. Search Search. The purpose of this review is to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up of laboratory TPAD. Just to give you an example, in the Journal of Organic Chemistry, when you submit an article, reviewers can select one of 4 options: accept, accept with minor revisions, reconsider after. edu or [email protected] After extensive discussion at its meeting in early August and on the recommendation of its Committee on Publications, the NAS Council voted to approve the proposal to eliminate Communicated papers from PNAS, effective July 1, 2010, and strengthen the system of Prearranged Editors. After much time reading and comparing specs and features, I have decided to go for Affinity Photo by Serif, and for the video editor it was between Corel's Video Studio Ultimate 10, and Power Director 16 Ultimate. The editorials published by editors of journals representing the official organ of a society or organization are generally substantive. Deccan Herald brings breaking news, today's Live News on Sports, Business, Fitness, Entertainment, Opinions from leading. com ® editorial team highlights a curated selection of product recommendations. Koretsky presented the findings and recommendations of the Board of Scientific Counselors based on their review of specific Division of Intramural Research laboratories/units during 2013. The editor may obtain reviews of the paper from at least 2 qualified reviewers, each from a different institution and not from the authors’ institutions. The expert who served as the editor for your paper obtained 2 reviews, included below. the comparator tool GLCC campaigners have been using the E-Atlas to support engagement with national policy-makers and influencers. comment # 18: the february 11, 2011 decision by the national marine fisheries service to conduct an endangered species act status review of upper klamath and trinity rivers esu chinook (national marines fisheries service 2011) and their. Multiple rounds of review and revision are strongly discouraged. In this paper, we propose a deep influence propagation model to stimulate how users are influenced by the recursive social diffusion process for social recommendation. proceed further, it is assigned to an NAS Member Editor, a professional scientist and active researcher, who oversees the review process and determines suitability of the work for PNAS. the re-review of the parabens pending the input of such an expert. Chaplain's Corner Short essays written for the La Jolla Veteran's Hospital newsletter in La Jolla, California "Have a purpose in life, and having it, throw into your work such strength of mind and muscle as God has given you," wrote 1 Scottish essayist, historian, teacher and writer Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881). If you have a proposal that is currently under review, that is worth including but, similar to the publications section, you want to make sure that you have it separated in a way that makes it clear that it’s pending, not funded. We hope that this article will help you to avoid even accidental plagiarism. I have been appointed Associate Editor with. assisting the Guest Editors in the setup of special issues, overviewing the editorial process for individual manuscripts (mainly by taking the final decision whether a paper can be published after peer-review and revisions). 我们这篇文章于2010年6月底投到PNAS,投稿后很快通过了editor board review和editor review, 进入under review后等待了20天,意见回来后结果是拒稿,但是我们看了两个reviewer 的意见后感觉很不服:. After careful consideration, the editor decided that we cannot accept your manuscript. Review sample recommendation letters for an employee seeking a job promotion, with tips for what to include and how to write a reference for a promotion. Submission updated to 'pending recommendation' a few days ago. After the COTP receives the Letter of Intent under § 127. The research may also review possible methods of transporting power and data through fabric without impacting the fabric hand and weight. Roasting mutant sparrows over an open fire, kids will listen to a bent, toothless man recount his childhood visit to the great city of Detroit or Gary, Indiana, circa 2000. It is not rare for a reviewer to offer comments that are strongly negative but to then recommend that the manuscript be accepted pending revisions. We now understand that the injured spinal cord is in a precarious state, experiencing a complex cascade of inflammatory events and hemodynamic compromise. The consolidated net loss of the Group after providing for income tax amounted to $7. The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine publishes original papers on human biology and disease, as well as animal and in vitro studies, which contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. A larger follow-up study conducted by the same group randomized 141 patients after treatment for an acute episode to receive TMP-SMX every 2 days versus placebo for 1 year; this confirmed the efficacy of preventive treatment for up to 2 years after the treatment was stopped (recurrence rate at 3 years of 0 versus 20. Field portable instrumentation, such as in situ geochemical analyzers or broader field of view instruments like multispectral imagers or other imaging capabilities, has the potential to dramatically increase the science return of a planetary surface exploration mission. These publications were used by topic editors to summarize current knowledge about CA and to make 23 management recommendations, which were rated by class (size of effect) and level (estimate of certainty) according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association criteria. 343) in the supplementation groups. 239 comments Nick April 2, 2016 at 7:15 am. The editor agrees, the decision is rendered, and the manuscript proceeds to the revision stage or is accepted and forwarded to production to be prepared for publication. Results: The database consists of 1561 records for hunt years 2003–2017. The minor revision was some grammatical stuff. On the email inviting them to review there are 3 links, one to say they agree to review the manuscript, one that declines the invitation to review and one that specifies that the reviewer is unavailable to review this paper. This research, using a mouse model, shows that following inoculation of mouse-adapted bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) directly into the gut, infectivity subsequently becomes widespread in tissues of the oral cavity, including dental pulp, salivary glands and gingiva, during the preclinical as well as clinical stage of disease. Under Editor Review 2016-07-12 Under Editorial Board Review 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Completed 2016-06-27 Quality Control Review Started 2016-06-24 Author Approved Submission 2016-06-24 Preliminary Manuscript Information Submitted. Members of the Editorial Policy Committee and the CSE Board of Directors reviewed and commented on it. function, and mental health after sepsis, patients surviving sepsis hospitalization also report a range of other symptoms are worse after sepsis, such as numbness, fatigue, pain, visual disturbance, hair loss, and problems with dentition and nails [64]. Williams, MD, Deputy Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Recommendations. That's why we need editors to scrupulously enforce standards: As I explained in my post, it's not usually so easy to game H-index, but if an editor disregards peer review and encourages numerous papers by same authors, and does not challenge high rate of self-citation, then you have a winning formula for gaming of Hindex. In these cases, the handling editor acts as a referee, considering the review comments, re-reading the manuscript, and making the decision as to how the manuscript will be processed. Now that studies have confirmed the game served its purpose, the. The procedure was described in detail previously [4]. For more information, please [email protected] Submitted a manuscript 2 months ago. Now it went back to 'under review. the comparator tool GLCC campaigners have been using the E-Atlas to support engagement with national policy-makers and influencers. JNK Inhibitor-jnkinhibitor. journal Leczenie Ran, and is Editor of the Phlebology Review (Przeglad Flebologiczny) , both of which publish abstracts. Pnas Pending Recommendation After Under Review. From grammar and spelling to style and tone, Grammarly helps you eliminate errors and find the perfect words to express yourself. Page iv ABOUT THIS DIRECTORY This edition of the AIDS/HIV Treatment Directory marks the publication's tenth anniversary. Return to top 2019 — 1. Exterior and interior evidence of feeding on bolls was recorded 2 weeks after exposure to insects. He was interrupted by one of the MPs who asked whether the charts on display represented actual real historical data, or output from a computer model. A link to the directory of Academy members and their research interests is on the NAS website at. The possibilities for improved impact measurements and recommendation services, to name just two, are real and exciting. It is worth quoting again from David Victors report which he wrote up after reviewing ALL the documentation: Based on an extensive review and re-review of all the evidence I don’t see any support for these rapid corrosion, cracking and through wall penetration scenarios. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. 1 percent above it's year-ago. We appreciate the careful review and constructive suggestions. Turnitin solutions promote academic integrity, streamline grading and feedback, deter plagiarism, and improve student outcomes. Please note that we cannot guarantee success, and the Editor may choose to decline your request after reading your full response. " So basically, the AE (associate editor) has sent your revised paper out for review, and he/she has received recommendations from the referees that the paper should be published. The Section Editor sends these documents to the Editor-in-Chief with the recommendation to conditionally accept pending revisions, accept with no revisions, revise and resubmit, or reject without the option to revise. Conclusions that are overstated or out of sync with the findings will adversely impact my review and recommendations. The ratio of total before counts to total after counts is 1. Motivation: The editor should have sent out the paper for review as a similar paper had been published in PNAS last year and we had much better results than the method. A study that followed nearly 9000 men for over 18 years found that even after controlling for factors like high cholesterol, fatness, smoking and blood pressure, muscular strength was inversely related to risk of premature death from cancer or heart disease. Measles is an acute viral illness caused by a virus in the family paramyxovirus, genus Morbillivirus. health care system has a long and distinguished history of innovation. Examples can help you see what kind of content you should include in your document, while templates can help you get a sense of the best layout and what sections to use (such as introductions and body paragraphs). Now it went back to 'under review. Pnas Pending Recommendation After Under Review. Photograph: Stephen Hird/Reuters Scientists have also attacked the editors of PNAS - the journal of the US National Academy of. Yeah, I've had that too. journal Leczenie Ran, and is Editor of the Phlebology Review (Przeglad Flebologiczny) , both of which publish abstracts. Under Editor Review, 2014-06-16 Your paper may be. After mapping the existing initiatives, it may be necessary to organize periodic coordination meetings (or other coordination infrastructure) and involve all interested development partners in the finance plan formulation and implementation. "They made an assessment and they made recommendations, and on that basis we replaced one of the chillers. Except you took your first weigh-in after three weeks, in work boots and a heavy jacket, right after a big meal and then your last weigh-in at the end of the month, in just your boxers, right after doing a 20 km jog in a sweat suit. The Editor may reject the paper without further review or elect to have it sent to reviewers. An informal history of the the past 10 years of the OA movement, starting with Stevan Harnad's 6/27/94 listserv posting making the "subversive proposal" that authors archive their eprints for free online access by all, and offering the Harnadian perspective on subsequent events. The review process is now complete, and three thorough reviews from highly qualified referees are included at the bottom of this letter. Christine Laine, editor in chief of Annals of Internal Medicine, told Reuters that nutrition studies are challenging but also mentioned lack of evidence for avoiding meat for health reasons. For each user, the diffusion process starts with an initial embedding that fuses the related features and a free user latent vector that captures the latent behavior preference. SYS-CON's Enterprise Open Source Magazine took down the Limit Hold'em Shootout, taking home more than $278,000. Review sample recommendation letters for an employee seeking a job promotion, with tips for what to include and how to write a reference for a promotion. The GAMO Swarm Fusion 10X G2 Air Rifle has GAMO's Whisper Fusion sound suppression technology, designed to quiet down their spring & gas piston-powered airguns and mitigate the "twang. 3) Review by Associate Editor, assigned to Subject Editor: After I assign the article to the Associate Editor, they take another look at it to make sure it is really suitable for Biotropica, often in consultation with one the members of our Editorial Board. I prepared and, after review, released Linux 3. Page iv ABOUT THIS DIRECTORY This edition of the AIDS/HIV Treatment Directory marks the publication's tenth anniversary. You are also listed as a Guest Associate Editor on the Frontiers editorial board for the duration of the Topic. I then rebased the Debian package onto that. The Research Integrity Adjudications Panel concluded that the preponderance of the evidence in the record supported the following charges made against Kimon J. Tweet with a location. These emitted pollutants have been associated with numerous adverse public health and environmental impacts (Table 1). In accordance with the guiding princi-ples established by George Ellery Hale in 1914, PNAS publishes. Within these precious and pristine surrounds lies the heart of Hanford. The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine publishes original papers on human biology and disease, as well as animal and in vitro studies, which contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Masked review. PNAS manages the review process. A HIV-positive man convicted for having unprotected sex with three women has lost an appeal, after a South Australian judge rejected defence claims the virus does not exist. The Directors did not pay any dividends during the financial year. The Nextbase 612GW is the first dash cam to arrive at Trusted Reviews offering such a resolution, promising the most detail yet for personal driving surveillance. After this phase, the AE would send her/his report to the EiC (Editor in Cheif), for the. Play daily or season long fantasy football, baseball, basketball and more. Journal Evaluates the Reviews. By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, PNAS rejected our manuscript. But after reading a book of poems Matt wrote for his estranged mistress, Willa decides she will settle for nothing less than the feelings that inspired him to write such tender words. Robinson's grandmother, Sharon Irwin, urged the City Council to accept the recommendations. Submission updated to 'pending recommendation' a few days ago. The Editor-in-Chief position is honorary. 2011-10-01. After review, the member editor makes a recommendation about acceptance to the Editorial Board member. eLetters will be considered by the associate editor who handled the review of the corresponding JBC paper whenever possible, and a copy of the letter will be sent to the authors for a response. Unsolicited reviews are also acceptable pending peer review by the editorial board. After the top rated review, the remarks purchasers make about their 39 POUNDS of Cheez Whiz are pretty great. The chief editor of the journal Climate Research and critic of Mann’s research, Hans von Stroch, and several other editors, resigned in protest over the editorial process. 19991 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN EXPERT TESTIMONY tions,3 but the problems it presents are particularly acute in liti- gation. Puducherry Minister for Health Malladi Krishna Rao has appealed to Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi to take steps to implement welfare measures and clear certain long-pending issues in his. After 2 y of daily isoflavone exposure, all clinical chemistry values remained within the normal range. CNN: "Hillary Clinton's emails have become art-- and the former secretary of state herself went to take a look.